Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel Pembrink's avatar

You write with sincerity—and I want to honor that. But sincerity is not the same as truth. What you’ve offered here is beautiful in tone, but it carries a theology that cannot bear the weight of the Cross. It feels like peace, but what it quietly removes is the Person who alone brings peace.

You claim truth is beyond words. But the Word became flesh. You say Yeshua is the Logos—but then you place Him alongside Om, Tao, and Brahman, as though His wounds were interchangeable with symbols. You say all names point to the same God. But Christ named Himself—and He named sin. He didn’t dissolve the ego. He carried it to death.

You say we must clean the house to reveal the light already within. But the Gospel I know doesn’t teach that we uncover salvation. It teaches that we receive it, because Someone died to give it.

So I offer this not as a correction, but as a plea: that you may one day meet the Christ who is not felt into being, but revealed in blood and mercy. Not an archetype. Not a cosmic current. But the crucified and risen Son of God.

Not for integration. But for redemption.

If you ever want to talk more—about why I believe this, or what I’ve come to carry—I’m here. Not to argue. But to witness.

Because not all presence is communion.

And not all peace leads home.

But Christ does.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts